It is time for the United States to cease its Cold
War-style reliance on nuclear weapons as a
foreign-policy tool. Current U.S. nuclear weapons policy
is immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and
dreadfully dangerous.
Is it really the case that, as the
British tabloid the Daily Mirror famously put it, nearly 60
million Americans were simply too “dumb” to understand the
implications of reelecting George W. Bush? It seems so...But
as appealing as it is, folly does not constitute a
sufficient explanation of the 2004 election.
September 11, 2001, was a catalytic event that revealed
the core character of the Bush administration’s national
security team. As rival factions fought for the
president’s ear, the transformative ideals espoused by
the neocons gained ascendancy—triggering a rift that has
split the Republican foreign-policy establishment to its
foundations.
The neoconservative and paleoconservative assault on Kofi
Annan and the UN has been like a slightly slower version of
the Swift Boat veterans' campaign against Democratic
presidential nominee John Kerry. Listening to the cable
pundits, you would never suspect that there is no proof at
this point that Annan, or indeed anyone else at the UN, did
anything wrong.
Not since Richard Nixon’s conduct of the war in Vietnam
has a U.S. president’s foreign policy so polarized the
country—and the world. Yet as controversial as George W.
Bush’s policies have been, they are not as radical a
departure from his predecessors as both critics and
supporters proclaim. Instead, the real weaknesses of the
president’s foreign policy lie in its contradictions:
Blinded by moral clarity and hamstrung by its enormous
military strength, the United States needs to rebalance
means with ends if it wants to forge a truly effective
grand strategy.
By deciding to invade Iraq, the Bush
Administration decided not to do many other things: not
to reconstruct
Afghanistan, not to deal with North
Korea and Iran, and
not to wage an effective war on terror. An inventory of
opportunities lost.
The lack of sustained engagement with Iran harms American
interests, and direct dialogue with Tehran on specific areas of mutual
concern should be pursued.
As the
president says, we misunderestimate him. He was not born stupid. He chose
stupidity. Bush may look like a well-meaning dolt. On consideration, he's
something far more dangerous: a dedicated fool.
In Niger, a desert country twice the size of Texas, most of the 11 million people live on a dollar a day. Forty percent of children are underfed, and one out of four dies before turning 5. And that's when things are normal...
To the aid workers charged with saving the dying, the immediate challenge is to raise relief money and get supplies to the stricken areas. They leave it to the economists and politicians to come up with a lasting remedy.
One such economist is James Shikwati. He blames foreign aid.
"When aid money keeps coming, all our policy-makers do is strategize on how to get more," said the Kenya-based director of the Inter Region Economic Network, an African think tank.
"They forget about getting their own people working to solve these very basic problems. In Africa, we look to outsiders to solve our problems, making the victim not take responsibility to change."
<< Home